“Assuming the Risk” of a Hazardous Condition
Even if a land owner (or a person in possession or control of land) breaches a duty owed to a plaintiff, and the plaintiff suffers injuries, the land owner may escape liability if a legally recognized defense applies in a way that limits or eliminates the defendant’s responsibility for the harm.
Over the next couple of weeks, this blog will take a look at some of the defenses impacting land owners’ liability for defects and hazardous conditions, and when they may (or may not) apply.
IN SOME CIRCUMSTANCES, PLAINTIFFS “ASSUME THE RISK” OF INJURY
The defense of “Assumption of Risk” applies where a plaintiff chooses to participate in an inherently dangerous activity (or engage in inherently dangerous conduct) under appropriate circumstances.
Generally speaking, assumption of the risk requires:
1. An inherently dangerous situation, condition, or activity.
2. The plaintiff knew (or should have known) about the dangers. (NOte: the plaintiff needs to have the capacity to understand and make an informed decision about the dangers.)
3. The plaintiff chose to engage in the activity notwithstanding the risks.
“Assumption of the risk” represents a legal determination that a defendant’s duty of care may be eliminated where the plaintiff’s relationship to the defendant and understanding of the activity make it reasonable for the plaintiff to accept responsibility for the decision to participate in dangerous activities.
One common example of assumption of the risk is playing football. Football players understand that the way the game is played creates certain risks of injury (for example, a risk of concussion), and the player who elects to play organized football (for example, in the NFL) is deemed to accept the risk of certain types of injuries which commonly occur as a result of football-related activities. However, the players do not accept extraordinary risks – for example, the risk of being run over by a fan who drives a pickup truck onto a field, in violation of stadium rules.
THE DEFENDANT’S CONDUCT CAN IMPACT A PLAINTIFF’S ASSUMPTION OF RISK
In order for the assumption of risk defense to apply, the defendant cannot misrepresent the risks to the plaintiff or to others under circumstances where the plaintiff might rely on those misrepresentations. Also, the defendant cannot act in a way which increases the plaintiff’s risk beyond the risks the plaintiff has accepted.
If you believe you have a claim against a property owner, or someone in possession and control of property, consult an attorney promptly. Delay could damage your claims and legal rights. If you’re a landowner uncertain about the nature and extent of your legal obligations to repair, maintain, and warn, either with regard to adults or for minors, consult an attorney for an individual evaluation of your rights and obligations.
DISCLAIMER: This article is intended for informational purposes only, does not constitute legal advice to any person or entity, and does not create an attorney-client relationship with any person or entity. Premises liability is a complex legal topic, and no single article can provide complete or comprehensive coverage or information about this or any other legal topic or issue. Your personal liability may differ, based on your individual facts and circumstances. If you believe you have a legal claim or issue, or wish to know more about your individual rights, consult an experienced attorney without delay.