Placeholder Image Robert Ross, Attorney at LawHelping People Seeking Justice Downtown in the EveningBreach of Contract & Business Torts Meeting RoomLegal Malpractice & Professional Negligence Outside of a modern HouseReal Estate & Construction Litigation Emergency Room SignWrongful Death  Personal Injury Litigation

What is “Abuse of Process”?

ABUSE OF PROCESS CLAIMS ARISE WHEN SOMEONE MISUSES THE JUDICIAL PROCESS.

“Abuse of process” is not merely a description of wrongful behavior; it is also a cause of action in California. Lawsuits for “abuse of process” arise when someone seeks to recover damages (normally, money) because someone else has attempted to use (or succeeded in using) the court or a court process for some purpose other than the purpose for which the relevant legal process was designed. Using the court for ulterior purposes is inappropriate and, in proper circumstances, actionable.

Claims for abuse of process require substantial misuse of judicial process–generally more than simply filing a legal action–and the party bringing an abuse of process claim must also be able to allege the wrongful or improper purpose for which the legal process was initiated, used, or abused.

ELEMENTS OF THE ABUSE OF PROCESS CLAIM.

In California, a valid claim for abuse of process requires a plaintiff to prove all of the following elements, to the required standard of evidence:

1. The defendant used or utilized a specific, identifiable legal process or procedure (for example, taking a deposition).

2. The defendant intentionally used the relevant legal procedure for some reason other than the procedure’s intended purpose.

3. That the plaintiff suffered legally recognizable harm.

4. That the defendant’s abuse of the legal process was a substantial factor in causing the plaintiff’s harm.

ABUSE OF PROCESS IS DIFFERENT FROM MALICIOUS PROSECUTION.

Abuse of process is a claim in its own right, and differs from malicious prosecution. Malicious prosecution claims require a defendant to engage in willful use of the legal process in ways that are not proper in the regular course of a proceeding, and doing so with an ulterior (and inappropriate) motive. One distinctive difference between the two causes of action is that, in California, improper filing or maintaining/continuing a lawsuit may give rise to malicious prosecution claims, but merely filing a lawsuit (or continuing to prosecute or maintain one) does not generally form a proper basis for claims of abuse of process.

***

Disclaimer: THIS ARTICLE IS FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY, AND DOES NOT CONSTITUTE LEGAL ADVICE OR CREATE AN ATTORNEY-CLIENT RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE AUTHOR AND ANY PERSON. Your rights and experiences may vary. Never use an online article (including this one) to evaluate your legal claims. Speak with an experienced lawyer promptly to obtain a personalized evaluation of your claims, possible damages, and options. You may lose or compromise your rights if you delay in consulting legal counsel. Negligence and premises liability claims are complicated and fact-dependent. If you believe you have a claim against a property owner who permitted or failed to repair a dangerous condition, or any other type of legal claim, consult an experienced lawyer immediately for an evaluation of your possible rights and claims.

Designed and Powered by NextClient

© 2015 - 2018 Robert S. Ross. All rights reserved.
Custom WebShop™ law firm website design by NextClient.com.

Quick Contact Form - Tab