Tag Archives: legal malpractice
Tolling the Statute of Limitations During Continuing Representation
GENERALLY, THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS IS TOLLED FOR THE DURATION OF THE ATTORNEY’S REPRESENTATION OF THE CLIENT.* *However, some exceptions do exist, as we will discuss below. The statute of limitations on malpractice is generally tolled for the duration of the attorney’s representation of the client in the ongoing matter where the malpractice occurred…. Read More »
Tolling the Statute of Limitations on Malpractice
WHEN DOES A CLIENT “DISCOVER” LEGAL MALPRACTICE FOR PURPOSES OF THE STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS? A client has “discovered” an attorney’s malpractice for statute of limitations purposes when the client knows or should have known about the lawyer’s wrongful act or omission. The client does not have to realize that the wrongful act constitutes “negligence” or “malpractice”… Read More »
Understanding the Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice Cases, Part 2
To read this article from the beginning, click here for Part 1: WHAT DOES “TOLLING” MEAN? A statute that is “tolled” is effectively “paused.” With regard to the statute of limitations (a law that limits the amount of time a plaintiff has to bring a lawsuit against a defendant) any facts or situations that “toll”… Read More »
Understanding the Statute of Limitations in Legal Malpractice Cases (Part 1)
WHAT IS A STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS? A statute of limitations is a law (a “statute”) that limits the amount of time a plaintiff has to bring a legal claim against a defendant. In cases involving legal malpractice (professional negligence) the statute of limitations controls how much time the allegedly injured plaintiff has to bring a case… Read More »
Emotional Distress in Legal Malpractice Cases
EMOTIONAL DISTRESS DAMAGES ARE NOT NORMALLY AVAILABLE IN LEGAL MALPRACTICE ACTIONS Some lawsuits, and some types of claims, allow a plaintiff to recover (or attempt to recover) damages to compensate for emotional distress (and resulting injuries) suffered as a result of a defendant’s wrongful conduct. The general rule in California is that damages for… Read More »
Punitive Damages in Attorney Malpractice Actions
WHAT ARE PUNITIVE DAMAGES? Punitive damages are a form of damages courts can order defendants (including defendant attorneys, in proper circumstances) to pay to prevailing plaintiffs. Punitive damages are monetary in nature, and represent amounts in excess of damages actually suffered by the plaintiff. Although punitive damage awards are not available in all cases (in fact,… Read More »
Understanding Damages in Legal Malpratice Cases (Part 1)
DAMAGES ARE A MANDATORY ELEMENT OF A PLAINTIFF’S CLAIM FOR LEGAL MALPRACTICE. If the plaintiff cannot demonstrate that (s)he has actually suffered damage (as a result of the attorney’s breach of a legally recognized duty), the plaintiff cannot prevail, even if the attorney did actually breach a legally recognized duty to the plaintiff. This is true… Read More »
When is the Lawyer’s Conduct NOT the Cause of the Plaintiff’s Damages?
NOT ALL WRONGFUL ACTIONS CONSTITUTE ACTIONABLE MALPRACTICE Losing a lawsuit is stressful, and plaintiffs often want to hold “someone” responsible for the loss. However, losing a lawsuit (without more) is not malpractice, and even if an attorney did act improperly in the course of representation, not every wrongful act or error constitutes actionable malpractice. Similarly,… Read More »
How to Identify a Lawyer’s Breach of Duty to a Client
“Breach of a duty (owed to the plaintiff)” is a major element of a legal malpractice case, and like the other elements, the plaintiff bears the initial burden of proving breach of duty. BREACH OF DUTY IS NORMALLY A QUESTION OF FACT At trial, issues of law are normally decided by the judge, but… Read More »
When Does a Lawyer Owe a Duty of Care to Non-Clients?
GENERALLY, ATTORNEYS OWE NO PROFESSIONAL DUTY TO NON-CLIENTS. The general rule in California (and elsewhere) is that while attorneys owe a professional duty to their clients, and may be held legally liable for a breach of that duty, attorneys owe no such duty to people and entities they do not represent. Since duty is a mandatory… Read More »
